">

eddobloggo® Commentary Archive

10/17/10 Gourmet Gravy
10/1410 You're only Young Twice
10/10/10 Barry the Exterminator
10/3/20 Chicago: It's time for a real change.
10/1/10 He reported. You decided.
9/26/10 Slap that wig hat on your head.
9/23/10 Stinkin' up the joint.
9/16/10 Could one perfect storm 'succeed' another?
9/10/10 Firing up terrorist recruitment.
9/3/10 Laboring under a delusion.
8/27/10 Incumbents sharing Tea and joy.
8/22/10 Has the truth about Obama's religion been told?
8/15/10 Benefit of the doubt.
8/11/10 The other cranks and conspiracy nuts.
8/8/10 Hold the pickles or gimme the works?
8/1/10 Buddy, can you spare a Yuan?
7/29/10 Wright back to Ludacris
7/25/10 Obama begs lefties to "keep up the fight"
7/23/10 Race Card/Slowness Card
7/18/10 An OnStar call replay call you'll never hear...
7/15/10 Gibbs, P.I.
7/11/10 The Skinny On Obama's Campaign Value
7/8/10 The Spy Poker World Cup Hotdog Channel
7/4/10 The free right to rant ain't free anymore.
6/27/10 Labor Sec'y Solis: "We Can Help" illegals
6/25/10 Fly in the Sugar Bowl
6/21/10 The French dis-Connection
6/18/10 Subliminal Spellbreakers
6/13/10 Are you afraid yet?
6/10/10 "What's all this talk about ki**ing a**?"
6/4/10 Is there a bureaucrat in the house?
5/30/10 When you care enough to send the very best...
5/27/10 Did you really think?
5/21/10 Multi-cultural Infidels
5/16/10 An anti-social socialist?
5/14/10 "Never let a good crisis go to waste."
5/9/10 "For here or to go?"
5/7/10 What you may not know about SEO

5/2/10

MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY

4/25/10

Show us the car facts...

4/23/10

Dwarfed by a bowel movement?

4/18/10

Guess who's giving us the finger -- again.

4/16/10

Yo ho ho and a dog named BO

4/12/10

Carry-On My Wayward Sen.

4/9/10

Triple-A Criticism by Liz Cheney

4/4/10

Bully in the pulpit.

4/2/10

Relatively Fast

3/28/10

"It makes no census to me, Mom."

3/25/10

Break Glass/Pull Lever

3/21/10

Slap that wig hat on your head.

3/19/10

Demon Pass

3/14/10

"Their erstwhile hero."

3/12/10

Surveys turn buyers into liars.

3/9/10

The more it changes.

3/5/10

Get ACLU! (Taliban Lawyers do)

2/28/10

A Monumental Government Land Grab

2/24/10

The Chai Party

2/21/10

Don't confuse us with those other extremists.

2/19/10

Karl Rove helps set the left's Tea Party trap.

2/14/10

corruption.guv

2/11/10

The sound of one hand clapping.

2/7/10

Have a seat and some tea.

1/31/10

The Obama Accelerator Pedal Recall

1/29/10

The State of the Union in 200 words or less.

1/24/10

OnStar call replay call you'll never hear...

1/20/10

NJ, VA, MA and a near-miss in NY

1/17/10

Dealing with the Car Czar...

1/15/10

What can YOU say?

1/10/10

"Systemic Failure" = Obama Failure

1/3/10

Some Good News About Heart Attacks

1/1/10

Homeland Security picture is out of focus.

*

2009 Commentary Archive

*

XML Sitemap

 

 

Conservative Commentary

by Ed Donath

-------------------

© Copyright October 21, 2010

     All rights reserved worldwide.

eddobloggo logo

Ed Donath is eddobloggo.

"Defending the right to rant!"


You can't say that in public...or on public radio.       RSS feed


It comes as no surprise that National Public Radio (NPR) axed Juan Williams -- a well-known political pundit, newspaper columnist and book author -- after saying on FoxNews' The O’Reilly Factor that he gets nervous when boarding a plane with people dressed in Muslim garb.

 

Lefties have the audacity to call a black civil rights proponent like Juan Williams a bigot.

In response to Bill O'Reilly's assertion that “The cold truth is that in the world today jihad, aided and abetted by some Muslim nations, is the biggest threat on the planet," Williams agreed with O'Reilly: “I mean, look, Bill, I’m not a bigot.  You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous,” Juan Williams responded.

 

Call it irony or surrealism, but the piece I read just prior to the New York Times article about Williams' firing was a Newsmax report that began:

 

Among other lefty things, George Soros is a major contributor to NPR.Billionaire currency titan George Soros, long a patron of liberal political causes in the United States, is giving $1 million to Media Matters in what he says is an attempt to stop the growing popularity of Fox News. But Glenn Beck and other conservatives say it confirms their worst fears: that Soros is out to manipulate public opinion in the same way he steers currency trades.

 

Draw your own conclusion about whether NPR properly represents all of the taxpayer-granted and private sector-donated interests that support it; whether its PC grandstanding is nothing more than a veil that covers its progressive political activism.  Likewise, figure out for yourself whether George Soros has anything to do with NPR's coincidental firing of a staunch liberal whose opinions are more widely exposed to the TV audience of the left-hated FoxNews.

 

A larger point that you might miss in this Williams/Soros story juxtapositioning is that terrorism, even in its least life-threatening manifestations, always results in some people demonizing an entire class for the perceived misdeeds of a mere handful of the members of that class. 

 

The camp internment, by FDR, of Japanese-Americans after Japan's unprovoked raid on Pearl Harbor is a good, if not extreme, example.  A more perfect modern-day example is the portrayal, by the left, of Christians who oppose the encroachment of the federal government as Tim McVeigh-style terrorists.  

 

Americans, even liberal Americans of color like Juan Williams, have become uncomfortable with Muslims in certain settings as a result of jihadists' (large "T") Terrorism.  But the mouthed (small "t") terrorism of the largely Soros-funded far left and its sympathetic mainstream media has led to the demonizing of moderate Fox employees like Juan Williams, Mike Huckabee, Bill O'Reilly and Greta Van Susteren -- personalities who go out of their way, often to the dismay of right-wingers, to offer a "fair and balanced" portrayal of sociopolitical issues.   

 

Even uber-conservative FoxNews host, Sean Hannity, who minces no words regarding his anti-socialism, often features liberals like Juan Williams, hard-left pundits and outright extremist administration shills in his discussion panels.  The same fairness cannot be attributed to MSNBC's unilateral format or to CNN's neutered PC attempt at balance.

 

Add the honchos at NPR to the list of progressives who are preoccupied with freedom of speech but are lightning quick to silence -- or walk out on -- anyone who refuses to express himself in a PC manner.  PC, therefore, now stands for Progressive Censored.

 

eddobloggo home/archive

 

SCROLL DOWN TO ADD A COMMENT

 

ADD YOUR COMMENTS.... Please provide your name (or screen name) and geographical location.

  Click here to send comments if you experience difficulty with this form or to sign up for the eddobloggo® e-mail list.

 


Reader Comments:

Comments may be edited for clarity and/or profanity.


I'm sorry, perhaps I missed it, but could you point me to your column of oh so sorrowful condemnation of CNN when they fired Rick Sanchez for his foul comments about Jews?

 

IowaGuy

Des Moines, IA Register

[Can you point me to where the Commie News Network is funded by the taxpayers, socialista Soros organizations and uninformed contributors? I know it's not in the Alinsky playbook to stay on point...but please try. -ED]


Dang, Ed, here's where you and I can agree. I often find Williams to be way out to the left of what I believe. But this is too much. Whether one agrees with him or not, he has an opinion and should be allowed to voice it, anywhere and at any time.  I'm told that Williams has responded, but I haven't had a chance to read it, yet.

 

oldsquid

Austin, TX American-Statesman


Ahh yes...this should be big news but I predict it will be swept under the rug (at least by the left).

 

jeepersagain

Wausau, WI Daily Herald

[In keeping with the Alinsky model, lefties will attack conservatives, Christians, Fox and the GOP for putting bigot-speak in Williams' mouth. -ED]


Look, Sanchez and Williams are both pawns in a game of speech repression, and neither case is funny. (Disclaimer; as a person of Jewish heritage I DID find Sanchez offensive...) But my sensitivities, or those of Muslims in the case of Williams are not what is at stake here. If we so 'sanitize' speech, make it so 'politically correct', then we limit the flow of ideas. I am no fool, I know that news outlets are funded and ran by people with set ideologies. We are simply witnessing those core sponsors exercising their central beliefs, and in a sense this helps clarify for the consumer the outlook of said outlet.

 

JimRobinson3

Des Moines, IA Register


Actually, George Soros donated 1.8 million DIRECTLY to NPR... Juan Williams was one of the few democrats that I consider sane. He saw reality ans even though there were policies he viewed as favorable and I didn't like he usually made a lot of sense.
Juan Williams SPOKE THE TRUTH in that interview with Oreilly. Isn't that what journalists are SUPPOSED TO DO? The fears Juan spoke of I have now heard echoed by many other prominent people and I also could commiserate with them.

This is just the start of George Soros"s attack on Fox News and ANYBODY else that speaks the truth.
The progressive socialists are desperate and will stop at nothing.

 

fishinjunky

Great Falls, MT Tribune


The last 20 years of liberal bigotry has come to a head and as the rest of us have come to expect...not one liberal speaks up to defend his firing.   DEMOCRAT at its most basic form stands for bias, false accusations about others and a "anything goes" mentality.
 

Nov 2nd is the day we throw democrats out...along with their sheep.

 

nobama4me

Montgomery, AL Advertiser


I drew my final conclusion about NPR when one day I heard them brag about being commercial free radio just before they broke for a commercial. 

 

iconoclast

Phoenix, AZ Arizona Republic


I missed the 'opinion' part of the equation. Williams was not expressing an opinion. Just a factual account of his emotions. As compared to the Sanchez kerfuffle. I saw Williams back on O'Reily thursday nite. Learned that Williams is the only black news man at NPR. How's that diversity thing working out?

While everybody slams FOX, notice their commentary shows like Hannity, and O'Reily often have liberal guests. Williams will in fact be hosting O'Reilly's show tonite. Maybe Hannity will be filling in for Olberman, and Rush will fill in for Mara Liasson...

 

...No one is claiming there is a wrongful termination. Just that an entity that claims diversity is the paradigm all information must marinate in, does not in fact embrace diversity of opinion. As far as NPR not allowing their commentators on other venues. I have seen Juan and Mara just to name a few on many panels. Their exposer is a great asset to NPR especially if they stray from NPR talking points gives all their opinions more credibility. I recall when Juan defended Rush against racist charges and the black liberal making the charges, told Juan to get back on the porch. Evidence that Juan is black, just not the right kind of black.

 

iowan2

Des Moines, IA Register


NPR sells themselves as politically unbiased, but anyone who listens closely to their news stories, shows such as "Wait, wait, don't tell me", and their essay/opinion pieces will quickly pick up on their subtle left-wing lean. I actually remember thinking before that I bet they didn't like Juan being a Fox contributor. All they needed was one little statement that could be misconstrued and they pounced on it. Heaven forbid that there be such a thing as a reasonable, logically thinking liberal.

It truly is a shame when you voice an honest opinion, which, coincidentally, reflects the sentiment of most Americans, and you lose your job for it. oh well, the way I see it, it's their loss and everybody else's gain. I can say this...APR won't be getting a contribution from me this year.

 

MypalBalok

Montgomery, AL Advertiser  


Juan Williams is one of a handful of "liberal" contributors on Fox News. I often disagree with his opinions, but he speaks from his heart and I respect that. Contributors like Mr. Williams help keep Fox News "fair and balanced". He is never hostile.

I find the firing of him by NPR to be astounding, as were the comments made by NPR officials. This guy is bridge builder who makes the liberal arguments on Fox News several times a week. I enjoy hearing both sides of an argument, and then "I decide".

I would support a de-funding of NPR from any and federal tax dollars.

 

MikeMcCulloch

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun


 Here's a few points dead-oh that, of course, you don't consider.


1)As a viewer of Fox, I've rarely seen positives about Democrats, and negatives about Republicans. Is this censorship?
2)This isn't Juan's first time coming to the woodshed. I wonder if Bill O'Rickets said, "I think Obama was correct about healthcare' would have flown? NPR was forced during the Bush Administration to hire a person to "balance" stories. If you ever listen, you will be surprised, but Rush Limbaugh didn't give the Zombies permission to listen to NPR, so they won't.
3)The only reason this matters to anyone on the right is they can, justifiably in this case, attack the perceived evil-doer.

Williams firing is nothing new in the corporate world. In fact, if you spoke out in favor of Democrats at Clear Channel during the Bush times you were canned.  I agree this was stupid by NPR. But ask yourself this: why should the left be silenced just because you disagree with them? If you think that is justified, would it be justified for the left to shut off the right if reversed? This was less about Juan getting fired and all you "compassionate conservatives" caring about censorship as much as it is you saw a crack to kick your opponent, an opponent that in a free society has the right to exist. The only reason NPR exists is because corporate radio and TV can't make enough money off opposing views than Big Oil, Insurance and a social agenda they don't agree with.
I've lobbied to have all of public broadcasting put into a private non-profit trust, thus freeing them to unleash without restraint on the right, but I guess you'd think that was wrong, too.

 

crawl090318042012

Wausau, WI Daily Herald

[Say what you want, but as regards Fox...Williams and countless "Democrat Strategists" and lefty pundits are PROMINENTLY featured. And if you want to call NPR corporate then they need to get de-funded and line up to beg Yobama for stimu-less like other corporate entities. -ED]


NPR Hypocrisy at its best and now the usual lefties try to defend the indefensible. Juan spoke how he felt and his boss stated that he need to talk to his psychiatrist who is going to fire her for her insensitive remark?

 

keithDoperman

Lansing, MI State Journal


I have no sympathy for Juan Williams has consistently slammed anti obama folks as racist, bigots, and the like. His disdain for the Tea Party and Conservatives is clear and vocal.  Seeing FOX rally around this bigot (my opinion) makes me think less of them.  NPR would not have fired him if he was condemning the right as is his usual mode of operation.  The First Amendment gives us the right to free speech, but not a platform to express it.  I will continue to change the channel when Williams is on the air, secure in my opinions of his true nature.


Deserttrek
Palm Desert, CA

[Defending Williams? Not as much as poking yet another hole in lefty hypocrisy and the abuse of our lefty government and its #1 contributor. -ED]


Anyone who thinks ANY news source is unbiased is a fool.  I can understand Williams fear, for I fear anyone wearing a cross on a flight. I'm afraid they'll pray for a safe flight, and get the same answer as those praying for amputee healings or to keep Jesus in the schools.

 

rainbowed

Great Falls, MT Tribune

[Sounds like you're more like Whoopi and Joy than like Juan. Besides, this flap is not about bias, it's about the denial of bias by the more biased of the biased. -ED]


It is funny to hear the right-wingers coming to the defense of Juan Williams. The right is interested in freedom of speech only when it pleases them.

As for Mr. Soros contributing a million dollars to try and hurt Fox, that is a small contribution compared to what Fox has pumped to the republicans. I doubt that his million dollars would have much effect on changing any political ideas. We CERTAINLY would not want a news outlet try and influence public opinion on politics, would we ??

 

nocturne

Montgomery, AL Advertiser

[NPR is not supposed to be a corporation, let alone a political organ of the administration. As for Soros, almost all of his donate-able fortune originates in foreign currencies. Spin that one nockworst. Furthermore, no one on the right is really "defending" Juan Williams -- least of all me because, as I said in my rant, he is a staunch lib. This is about punching holes in YOUR hypocrisy. Even a man of color gets called a bigot when he disagrees with lefties. At least they didn't call him a teabagger. -ED]


When there was only three channels there might of been a reason for CPB. But now with hundreds of channels it is no longer needed...or more accurately can continue, just without any tax money. Same with NPR. The tax money can be spent better elsewhere...and we have to cut back somewhere. Might as well start here.

 

Antonious

Austin, TX American-Statesman


"personalities that go out their way to portray a fair and balanced platform"-Say what??? I didn't know you had a comedic side to your persona eddo, and here I thought that the kool-aid drinkers were the liberals. Also I didn't know that only conservative "personalities" were the solely objectors of Mr. Williams firing.

 

ObiJuankanobi

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun

[I haven't heard one conservative object to Williams' firing. What I hear is conservatives objecting to the double standard that allows liberals to call even a black man who has spent his entire life being liberal and devoting a great deal of energy to writing about equal rights a bigot. Like I said above, at least they didn't call him a teabagger. As for the Fox personalities I mentioned in my rant, they are so busy being fair to the left that they often appear as lefties themselves. But you are absolutely right about libs being Kool-Aid drinkers. Ultimately, it causes death and a week from Tuesday we'll be finding the bodies. -ED]


Personally, I think Juan Williams is brilliant! I can only hope that the senators bill to cut off money to NPR because of William' firing goes through!!

 

boned

Great Falls, MT Tribune


As is usually the case once one leaves the “Dark Side”, Juan Williams fared much better fiscally, socially, and career wise. He also will be working with a more intelligent and nicer class of people.

 

USMC-1969

Melbourne, FL  Florida Today


Sounds like Juan Williams is playing the "victim" card. The one conservatives always accuse the liberals of using.

 

jgs1122

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun

[Juan Williams is a liberal. It's newsworthy because it's dog bites man for a change. -ED]


National Propaganda Radio fired Williams because he guests on Fox, period. Liassons' status is threatened. Clearly, NPR needs to be weaned from the public trough. If Sorros keeps buying in and controlling policy, the government should cash out.

What Williams said is Muslims purposely identifying themselves as such on a flight, in view of recent history, make him nervous. Having flown with a lot of muslims I found rather that outward signs of attitude, muslim or otherwise, makes me nervous. There are a lot of people wearing some cause on their sleeve these days, or are a little too whacky to be on a plane.

 

Rotorman

Lansing, MI State Journal


It is really sad that one cannot voice an opinion freely without fear of retaliation. I say forget political correctness and the fear of offending someone if it is the truth.

 

Anonymous

Titusville, FL


Leastways you read it. Glad to see they putzed up during the week of their National fund drive. That was not very smart.

Now lets start the campaign against public funding of the National Endowment For The Arts. That stuff sure isn't art. Stand on its own merit or wither and fall.

Bitterpill6

Melbourne, FL  Florida Today


edobloggo, I don't agree with you very often and I don't necessarily buy some of the case you make to reach your conclusion this time, but I have to say that I agree with the conclusion. NPR made a bad call and it's going to cost them in many ways. The situation reminds me a bit of the firing of Dept. of Agriculture employee Shirley Sherrod last July. Act in haste, repent at leisure.

 

Standby4321

Wausau, WI Daily Herald


so do think hurst was proper in giving helen thomas the retire or be fired ultimatum? because if so, your rant is hypocritical...what about rick sanchez?

 

plaztikjezuz

Lansing, MI State Journal

[Lefties can never stick to the point for fear that the real truth will ultimately be exposed to crystal clarity. In this case, unlike the Thomas and Sanchez instances, Williams' employment was terminated by an entity that exists, at least in part, as a result of taxpayer funding.  Furthermore, whether you like what JW said or not, it was... a) an answer to someone else's question b) an expression of his feelings c) devoid of hate speech. So if Williams was being anti-Muslim then NPR was being pro-Muslim.

 

To the extent that lefties (in your case, hypocrites who openly mock the name of our Lord but defend Muslims' rights when it is convenient to do so to foment anti-conservative hatred) abhor the mixing of church and state (or church and anything, for that matter) NPR has committed a cardinal sin by libs' own standards-- for which, of course, they are now being applauded by progressive-socialists. -ED]


I respect Juan Williams, even if I don't always agree with him. That Soros had him fired is a given, especially in light of the subsequent remarks made by the so-called CEO of NPR.

I have often thought, considering how slow Soros has been moving of late against the US through his puppets like Obama, that there must be other forces at work in opposition to him and his gang of global socialists and communists, forces that singly perhaps could not afford to take him on, but jointly can and presently are.

You have the Koch brothers on one hand, you have Rupert Murdoch on the other--and these are only the ones we can see. I wish we knew who else is in the fight against Soros and his thugs, but I don't believe in showing my entire hand either.

If Soros and his global gang of thieves were truly unopposed, they would've already moved to collapse the currency and make Obama the tyrant he fancies himself to be. But something is stopping Soros and his thugs, and I don't think it's just the conservative movement in this country.

 

Think back to the vote on Obamacare. Those democrats in both House and Senate that voted in favor voted as if there were no consequences or concerns. Why? In my experience, few politicians ever act without an eye to their own political future. It's not hard to deduce that they were promised something, something big that failed to materialize as planned.

If Soros had collapsed the currency this summer, if riots in the major cities over food had broken out--as designed--Obama would have every justification to declare martial law, suspend elections, and those democrats voting without any apparent concerns would keep their seats.

There must be opposition to Soros and his global conspirators, a fight taking place that we can't see. Otherwise, why would an opportunist like Rahm Emmanuel ever leave a going concern? Why are Obama's "advisors" deserting ship like the rats they are? Why is Soros coughing up substantial amounts of dough to take on Fox? A gang with a plan in the bag doesn't need to do this. And they all act as if they're on the ropes, as if something is fighting back.

The Tea Party, the conservative movement, all protest against is easily disposed of by simply declaring martial law. The internet is shut down, violent groups are put down militarily, elections on hold. The plans were so simple, so right there, yet Soros hasn't implemented them yet. Why? What is stopping him and his thugs? They sure weren't concerned about the Will of the People during the vote on Obamacare, were they?

What has changed behind the global scenes?

 

And as far as I'm concerned, those RINOs already floating the word "compromise" have outed themselves and their allegiances.

You cannot compromise with thugs. Bullies don't know the meaning of the word. Anyone suggesting you can compromise on anything with cutthroats like Soros and his global gang of socialist/marxists is not FOR America. And if you're not FOR America, you're against her, plain and simple, and that makes you my enemy.

 

novelator

Great Falls, MT Tribune

[A well-reasoned and certainly a well-written rant.   But what I've been saying since the outset is that these socialistas are just not as smart as they think they are...but certainly as ruthless and self-serving as you say they are -- which accounts for the rats deserting the ship and Soros pulling a Roberto Duran and waiting for the rematch.

Forget the fact that the troika has enabled its community organizer to take ACORN to the federal level. Even by their own ridiculous standards, everything he has ever touched has turned to manure; even the various lefty fringes say so, albeit for different reasons than us real-worlders do.  They all overestimated 0-bama's intelligence and ability. Therefore, they all realize that it's over and why it's over, at least for the time being. WHY?

Because they could never have gotten this far without an Obama-like candidate. He didn't exactly beat McRINO in a landslide and he has fudged-up EVERYTHING but the passing of the legislation that has the big money conservative ready to do battle against ANYONE to make him go away.  Furthermore, he has so tainted Democrats that even if there were another young, bi-racial, bi-religious multi-national lefty candidate waiting in the wings -- and there certainly ain't -- he/she would get laughed off the public stage with the first mention of the word "change".

So The First Lady of Pants Suits has become (literally) the Great White Hope and there's PLENTY of crooked money behind her just as there was for her phony, conniving stain-making hubby -- enough for Soros to put his plans on hold; to wait and see how it plays out from here. -ED]



 

read eddobloggo®  at...

 

Austin, TX American-Statesman

Lansing, MI State Journal Montgomery, AL Advertiser Rochester, NY Democrat&Chronicle Springfield, MO News-Leader
Des Moines, IA Register Mansfield, OH News Journal

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun

Salem, OR Statesman-Journal

St. Cloud, MN Times
Great Falls, MT Tribune Melbourne, FL  Florida Today Phoenix, AZ Arizona Republic

Salinas, CA The Californian

Wausau, WI Daily Herald


BorMar

 

e-finders

 

 Read More...

 

Who is the blog watchdog?

CD Business Cards

Enginneering Services, CD Business Cards and more from BorMar!

          Engineering Services

<< Get your website found!

          << Townhall

         << Grumpyelder

AXL the German Shepherd wonderdog is eddobloggo's best friend!

 

 It's AXL!

 Technologies

SEO Specialists

 Conservative Blogs

Adopt a pet!