Op/Ed


"No Change for You!"

 

 

A Conservative Blog

by Ed Donath

 

The more things change the more they stay the same.  "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose" was the way Jean Baptiste Alphonse Karr, a French journalist, wrote it more than a hundred years before Barack Obama was born.

 

While I don't care to see the USA become even as Europeanized as the far left envisions, the French version of Karr's quote was thrown in so the fairness checkers won't think I'm some kind of monolingual American dope when they shake out my dossier and say "No change for you!"

 

Oh, so you don't think censorship is likely to happen when the troika presidency (Obama/Pelosi/Reed) takes over?  What about those hardball journalists from the Washington Times and a couple of other newspapers who, after asking a few professional journalist questions about the "change" to come, were kicked off Obamaforce One while the rest of the softball lobbers were allowed to stay on and sip Kool-Aid with the boss when the plane landed?

 

What about those TV stations in Pennsylvania and Florida that were marginalized and boycotted after their anchors asked a few pointed questions of Joe Biden regarding his running mate's qualifications and political philosophy?

 

What about the national mockery made of "Joe the Plumber" for daring to query Obama about his previously undefined wealth redistribution policy when the candidate unexpectedly showed up in front of the would-be plumbing contractor business owner's Toledo home?  When humiliation failed to do anything but extend Joe's fifteen minutes, Democrat partisans in the Ohio state government accessed Samuel J. Wurzelbacher's computer files and leaked information to the press about the assistant plumber's tax, marital, motor vehicle, police and licensing records.

 

Perhaps you remember the last administration that punished critics for their remarks by using such water-boarding devices as IRS audits and media smearing? 

 

For starters, there were those four women who had accused President Clinton of sexual crimes while he was governor of Arkansas.  Paula Jones and Juanita Broderick were the two best-known targets of IRS harassment but there are newspaper archives and websites full of the names of Clinton enemies whose lives were made miserable as a result of this kind of intimidation.

 

"A veritable who's who of Clinton administration adversaries have been targeted for audit during his [then] six years in power. They include: the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Review, American Spectator and, of course, my own organization, the Western Journalism Center..." Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily wrote in 1999.

 

Will talk radio be censored under the guise of the Fairness Doctrine when the troika comes to power?

 

Will conservative columnists and bloggers be the subjects of investigations by Obama goon squads when they exercise their constitutional rights? 

 

Will whistleblowers and critics of the administration be audited by the IRS using a catch-all excuse like "we're trying to make sure that all of the taxes are being collected during these difficult economic times"? 

 

It is abundantly clear, after beating back a vastly more experienced Clinton smear team and convincing the media to ignore every controversy unleashed by the right (Obama's associations with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, ACORN, Tony Rezko, Franklin Raines plus the gap in his early resume, to name a few) that media manipulation is what Team Obama does best. 

 

How else could a woefully un-vetted, under-qualified candidate possibly have been elected on a one-word campaign slogan? 

 

Media manipulation campaign tactics will certainly be a large part of the next administration.  Unchecked and with the power of the federal government behind them they will "get better" with practice -- especially when the Supreme Court slants left after a couple of Obama appointments.

 

If you want your media soup you better line up in an orderly fashion and remain silent while you wait your turn.  And don't forget to grovel when you get to the head of the line.

 

home/archive

send e-mail

 

Reader Comments:


DrDooom wrote: Cincinnatti Enquirer
Is there a point somewhere in this post?

DrDoom

(from Cincinnati Enquirer)


"How else could a woefully un-vetted, under-qualified candidate possibly have been elected on a one-word campaign slogan?"

Probably because John McCain and Co. ran the most woefully awful campaign I've ever seen, or even studied. A message that changed 4-5 times throughout the campaign, an absolutely laughable pick for a vice presidential candidate, gaffes galore, and no clear policy that would help the American people.

Barack Obama was 8 years old when Bill Ayers was considered a domestic terrorist, so you are stretching the truth a lot if you consider that to be a connection worth looking at. Obama addressed the Rev. Wright situation publicly, and the American people clearly didn't think it was of enough concern to affect their vote.

Sore losers bring the country down and split people apart. Learn to love the new direction the country is going, and help to be a part of it. Together we can make this country something to be proud of again.

Kurt Percy
Norwood, OH

(from Cincinnati Enquirer)

[if you're serious about the togetherness so am I.]


...If President-elect Obama is all about "Change," in his administration why is his first pick a Clinton Administration veteran?

Mr. Obama was in a no-win situation there. Pick an unknown and people who questioned his experience would still question his experience; pick a veteran and get picked apart because of the ties to the previous Democratic Administration. I think Mr. Obama could have selected a much wiser and less flamboyant choice that Mr. Emanuel. Mr. Emanuel's ties to the Chicago political machine, his involvement with Freddie Mac, and his partisanship are indicators that the man with the ear of the president wants to turn the clock back - not look forward.

I do not begrudge the liberal Democrats turn at the White House, it is the system of rules that I accept with my citizenship; I just want to see a centrist (or center-left, if we must) tack for the SS America.

 

BuckeyeKev

(from Cincinnati Enquirer)


Change can happen, but not in one presidential term or two even. People naturally reject anyting "out of the ordinary". It's just the way things are and we need to understand that time really does change everything... in very few cases it does not.

 

tilli

(from Burlington Free Press)


What a load of rubbish. Your use of the word trioka (Russian for three of any kind) to label the Obama administration is being communist is delusional. Where do you get this crap?

[Thanks for saving my readers a trip to the online commie dictionary. -ED]


Eddo, doesn't matter how sophisticated you are or sound, if you convey a message contrary to the liberal way of thinking, you'll be vilified as a selfish, elitist, war-mongering imperialist. Good luck...I'd love to hear what you have to say.


RushTil2016

(from NewsLeader)

[You said it! - ED]


© Copyright Ed Donath

November 10, 2008

All rights reserved.