|
The more things change the more they stay the same.
"Plus ça
change, plus c'est la même chose" was the way
Jean Baptiste Alphonse
Karr, a French journalist, wrote it more than a
hundred years
before Barack Obama was born.
While I don't care to see the USA become even as
Europeanized as the
far left envisions,
the French version of Karr's quote was thrown in so
the fairness checkers won't think I'm some kind of
monolingual American dope when they shake out my dossier
and say "No change for you!"
Oh, so you don't think censorship is likely to happen when the
troika presidency (Obama/Pelosi/Reed) takes over? What about those
hardball journalists
from the Washington Times and a couple of other
newspapers who, after asking a few professional
journalist questions about the
"change" to come, were kicked off Obamaforce
One while the rest of the softball lobbers were
allowed to stay on and sip Kool-Aid with the boss
when the plane landed?
What about those TV stations in Pennsylvania and
Florida that were marginalized and boycotted after
their anchors asked a few pointed questions of Joe Biden
regarding his running mate's qualifications and
political philosophy?
What about the national
mockery made of "Joe the Plumber" for daring to query
Obama about his previously undefined wealth
redistribution policy when the candidate unexpectedly
showed up in front of the would-be plumbing contractor business owner's
Toledo home? When humiliation failed to
do anything but extend Joe's fifteen minutes, Democrat partisans in the Ohio
state government accessed Samuel J. Wurzelbacher's
computer files and leaked information to the press
about the assistant plumber's tax, marital, motor vehicle, police and
licensing records.
Perhaps you remember the last administration
that punished critics for their remarks by using
such water-boarding devices as IRS audits and media
smearing?
For starters, there were those four
women who had accused President Clinton of sexual
crimes while he was governor of Arkansas. Paula
Jones and Juanita Broderick were the two best-known
targets of IRS harassment but there are newspaper
archives and websites full of the names of Clinton
enemies whose lives were made miserable as a result of this kind of
intimidation.
"A veritable who's who
of Clinton administration adversaries have been
targeted for audit during his [then] six years in
power. They include: the Heritage Foundation, the
National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of
America, Citizens Against Government Waste,
National Review, American Spectator and, of
course, my own organization, the Western Journalism
Center..." Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily wrote
in 1999.
Will talk radio be
censored under the guise of the Fairness Doctrine when
the troika comes to power?
Will conservative
columnists and bloggers be the subjects of
investigations by Obama goon squads when they exercise
their constitutional rights?
Will whistleblowers and critics of the administration
be audited by the IRS using a catch-all excuse like
"we're trying to make sure that all of the
taxes are being collected during these difficult
economic times"?
It is abundantly clear, after beating back a vastly
more experienced Clinton smear team and convincing the
media to ignore every controversy unleashed by the
right (Obama's associations with Rev. Wright, Bill
Ayers, ACORN, Tony Rezko, Franklin Raines plus the gap
in his early resume, to name a few) that media
manipulation is what Team Obama does best.
How else could a woefully un-vetted, under-qualified candidate
possibly have been elected on a one-word campaign slogan?
Media manipulation
campaign tactics will certainly be a large part of the
next administration. Unchecked and with the
power of the federal government behind them they will
"get better" with practice -- especially when the
Supreme Court slants left after a couple of Obama
appointments.
If you want your media soup you better line up in an
orderly fashion and remain silent while you wait your
turn. And don't forget to grovel when you get to
the head of the line.
home/archive |