blog stats
W
 

eddobloggo®

eddobloggo - Defending the right to rant in the USA!

Defending the right to rant!

eddobloggo® - The logo for Conservative Commentary by Ed Donath

Conservative Commentary

Ed Donath is eddobloggo...Conservative Commentary Columnist

Ed Donath

February 20, 2011


The right to rant may not be 'free' for long.                                             RSS feed


Will the cost of a user blog subscription cause you to go back into your pre-blogging darkness?

For many of my readers, being afforded the opportunity to post their own opinions and respond to the opinions of others at their local newspaper's websites amounted a life-changing event; a coming out of the darkness so to speak. 

 

Ever since that day, scores of their fellow bloggers have read some or all of the thousands of written words they have presented -- and vice versa. 

 

It is also likely that you and/or some of your fellow posters are being read by more visitors to your hometown newspapers' websites than are any of its professional bloggers. On any given day, community bloggers are likely to amass substantially greater numbers of comments than their paid counterparts.

 

Thus far, other than being required to endure a few pop-up and pop-under ads, those overnight ad-spam blog attacks and the even more annoying onslaught of selfish blog hogs, the exercising of your right to rant at these Pluck-powered websites has been a walk in the park -- a freebie, at that.

 

Though I am not privy to the precise date that your paper might suddenly require you to become a paid subscriber in order to blog at its website, I can tell you with first-hand certainty that at least two of the chain's major outlets, the Greenville News and the Tallahassee Democrat, have already done so. 

 

Here is a facsimile of what now appears at these websites when you attempt to log in to perform a blogging function.  It is what you will probably see on that fateful day when your own favorite newspaper goes pay-for-play...


Some Gannett Newspaper websites are locking bloggers out until they pony up with some subsciption money.Want to view more?

This section and other exclusive local content now requires a subscription.

LOG IN

Log in if you're already a registered subscriber; or, choose one of the below options.

 

Three ways to get instant access:

I am a paying subscriber

but have not yet set up

my online access.

I want ongoing access
to content on www.____________

 I want 24 hours of

access to content on www.____________

ACTIVATE

MY ACCOUNT

GET WEBSITE-ONLY

ACCESS @ $9.95/mo.

PURCHASE A

DAY PASS FOR $2


As a strong advocate of free markets, I offer no criticism of newspaper companies that do what they deem necessary to survive and thrive.  However, being ostensibly an advertising revenue-based industry, it appears that the collective Gannett sales department may have dropped the ball.

 

Granted, our horrendous economy and the decidedly anti-commerce Obama administration have made it extremely difficult for advertisers to maintain, let alone ramp-up their advertising budgets. In addition, as has been the case for years, many people with Internet access are no longer subscribing to the newsprint editions of local newspapers.

 

Nonetheless, if management perceives that there are enough prospective-subscriber visitors at the user-participation pages of their websites to neutralize Internet ad revenue sluggishness, one might conclude that there are also a great many untapped advertisers who would be eager to have  their messages displayed before multi-visit daily readers like us.

 

If the economy is essentially to blame for Gannett's ad revenue crisis, could strapped consumers actually make up the difference? Would consumers consider paying for services that have until now been free, especially with money being so tight these days?

If you ultimately choose to hang up your newspaper website blogging shoes, where will you go as an alternative?  Hopefully not...

Will the cost of a user blog subscription cause you to go back into your pre-blogging darkness?

...back into the darkness.



If you don't think it's worth $10 to be able to throw in your 2¢

<<  Bookmark This Page

It won't cost you a dime and you'll always have a place to exercise the right to rant.


 

eddobloggo home  

 

  SCROLL DOWN TO ADD A COMMENT 

 

ADD A COMMENT

Please provide your name (or screen name) and geographical location.


  


Comments  (Comments may be edited  for clarity and/or profanity.)

Interesting. Newspapers have to make money somehow. I can't say that I am for it. The web will still offer other opportunities to blog and a blog could reach a wider audience. That is why I spread my blogs out through different sources. Thanks Ed!

 

JimCarver

Mansfield, OH News Journal 


There's no free lunch, Ed.

 

DaveMuckey

Salem, OR Statesman-Journal

[But it's easy to glom a free breakfast in a hotel lobby, -ED]


It is a tough time to be in the newspaper biz.

In addition to being able to get the info free on the web, (So why subscribe) advertising revenue is down and I've heard that getting paid for advertising already sold is getting tougher. The Times has asked for payment up front from regular customers, so you know they have been burned.

Recessions aren't much fun.

 

Zippit

St. Cloud, MN Times


How about blogspot.com? easy to register and free.
Tis changing times and disturbing times....good luck all

 

rocco0607

Great Falls, MT Tribune


...newspaper blogging, as done at the nj, has been a delight for me, with no real constraints for me, other than my own, and they've been mostly well-received.

would i miss the privilege? yes.
would i pay to write a newspaper blog? no.
there are far too many free outlets.

thanks for the heads up.

 

aloc102

Mansfield, OH News Journal 


Good rant Ed. Unfortunately even newsie types have to eat as well. I subscribe to the Statesman and enjoy it's online edition as well. Although I can get all the news I need via computer.

I agree there will come a day where people will find a blurb exactly as you described (pay or go). Hopefully the printed edition will not cease to be published.

 

gas hog

Austin, TX American-Statesman


Isn't communication pretty overrated when the fables we see from the media pass as "news" anyway. We'd probably be a little better informed if we had to work and judge data rather than the opinion of the media for ourselves. Take the nose rings out people.

 

deminn

St. Cloud, MN Times


I've wondered if and when this might happen...

 

GreyCaravel

Montgomery, AL Advertiser


I believe that losing a blog spot because the owner can not keep up with the costs would be a lose lose for everyone.  As a total addict of the view points of my fellow citizens. I would happily contribute to keep the blog alive, especially one run by a 100 year old publication like the Saint Cloud Times.

 

Anonymous

Minneapolis, MN


Not trying to take away from your blog...but... this is not new. Wait until you have to start paying just to view a website or watch a YouTube video.  In 2005, the New York Times tried this. Asked its online readers to pay for opinion and comment pieces. Dropped it after a revolt. This has just happened to the Times in London... pay to view.

Would I pay to play? Not on this site. Really who would on any site? Seems to me... only those who are making money doing it.

 

fourscore

Mansfield, OH News Journal


Meh. At this point I'm not bothered a bit by this direction. I'm not responding much to blogs anymore. Mostly because people are rude and obnoxious when disagreeing with others. Same goes for the comment section of articles. GF Tribune drops comments whenever they don't like the theme of the comments (although I do expect explicit derogatory comments to be removed).

 

horsedreamz

Great Falls, MT Tribune


One solution is...if they charge a fee to access online blogging, I will simply cancel my subscription to the AZ Republic in protest.

 

richiephx

Phoenix, AZ Arizona Republic


They [the media] got him elected? He's anti-free enterprise?  Are there any wingnut themes that you don't parrot, eddo?

BTW, thanks for the heads up. I actually think it's a good thing. There are way too many wackos - mostly on your side of course! - who love to spout off without saying anything of substance. If they had to pay a little bit, then perhaps the
[names local nuisance posters] of the world would go away, and folks like you and some of the other reasonably intelligent righties would be left... er.. would remain.

 

IowaGuy

Des Moines, IA Register

[The "themes" are based on the realities. -ED]


And if ANY publication needed this to happen, it's this one. This will slow down the "playground bully" stuff that seems to have taken over the blog section...Thanks for sharing Ed.

 

bigaztejas

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun


Some things are worth spending time on, some things are worth spending money on, and some things are not. Luckily we live in a free country where everyone is allowed to try to do what is best for them.

 

rainbowed

Great Falls, MT Tribune


Thanks for the heads up post eddo.

If/when this does occur here, I feel certain that many, if not most, of our familiar screen personalities will disappear and fall silent, and those who choose to pay to remain will not be read by as many.

 

UknowIknowU

Montgomery, AL Advertiser


If the TDS improved this site I would pay. But this is not the greatest news source.  To be honest it sucks at news. Thanks for the News Ed...good post.

 

catmandu

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun


Just because Gannett and the other greedheads want and wish to charge for these things doesn't mean that they'll be able to successfully do so. Remember, Rupert Murdoch predicted we'd paying for most of our online content by 2005...

Too late to close the barn door at this point...

 

baikal

Austin, TX American-Statesman


...In a nutshell, WE entertain, WE provoke thought, we fight, we care, we make a difference to this paper's readers. Hell no, I won't pay.

 

Dawncoyote

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun


I read the DH sports pages once in a while, my wife does the Xword some times, My Mom reads the commics, none of us read the news stuff. We have discussed dumping the DH for about the last 15 years, as we all found the Left slant and PC hard to take years ago. But hey, I am sure they are doing the best they can with what they have. Out side ownership I am sure didn't help. Last week my wife finally decided not to renew (She calls the shots). I will not miss it even though my wife and I were on the front page in November 1989 our loyalty has long passed. It would be a wrong move to charge for opinions and comments as most are not worth the paper or cyberspace they are printed on. The DH should just fold if the time comes to consider this option as it is already the end for news paper media. Charging people for blogging and comments would just delay the inevitable. I will miss the blog stuff, I do enjoy the give and take even though Malarkey always gets in the last word. P.S. the Feds are trying to get their hooks into email to save obsolete Post office jobs. Good thing they didn't do this for wheelwrights and 8-track workers. Firemen on trains and GM workers got lucky though, you never know.

 

oscarthepig

Wausau, WI Daily Herald


I would not pay to blog when I can do so for free on numerous other sites but if they wanted me to pay to read the online version I would not object. Having said that, if I'm paying for a newspaper subscription I would fully expect access to the online issue to be included in the subscription fee.

 

Marmalady

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun


Most newspapers started out charging for online access. then they wised up and realized that the revenue came from the ads not the online subscription fees. Charging bloggers for access will just reduce online readership.

Charging for online access to a newspaper or a blog is stupidity personified.

 

zagreb

Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun

[Stupidity or not, ad sales are weak -- perhaps the weakest link. -ED]


...Rupert Murdoch kicked off the pay-to-play trend awhile back. I've been an online Times (of London) subscriber for ages, but am now being kicked off unless I pay. For some online content I would be willing to put out, but the Times is no longer a great newspaper.

It will be interesting to see how this business model works. For a long time newspapers' profit, if there was any, was generated by advertising rather than paid subscribers.

 

beobservant

Salem, OR Statesman-Journal


For once eddo, I agree with you! Gosh this is killing me to admit it! As much as I dislike your constant Obama bashing I defend your right to express yourself. In fact, silly me, I believe that the free exchange of many ideas is what makes this country great. Even if I disagree with something I find that I learn from the exchange with others, and sometimes I can even be persuaded to change my opinion. If we must pay to blog, discussions will dry up overnight except for those who are rich, fanatics or both. One thing about the blogging communities is that it makes us think and is incredibly diverse. Sorry to see that this may be coming. End of free press. I have also heard that many sites are now demanding posters and bloggers use their real names and no more "screen names". This is also a death knell for free speech. I am very much against this as it is a fact that many educated men and women use screen names to discourage stalkers that may attempt physical harm or post terrible things about them for no good reason, thus destroying their business or professional credentials. This is especially true if posting for or against controversial subjects such as abortion, homosexual rights or politics. Even though such postings are untrue they may unfairly destroy someone's reputation or credit rating. Someone does not like Americans right to rant.

 

Shinelight

St. Cloud, MN Times

[I appreciate your honesty and certainly your agreement...although I think that I went pretty light on opinion in this case in favor of being merely a messenger.  That said, there are other rights and freedoms that are also in jeopardy -- and certainly not by private enterprise. If/when those are gone, there will be no alternative website at which to regain them at any price. -ED]


I agree with your post, I'm just surprised it took this long for the newspaper companies to do it.  I personally believe that blogging brings people to the website, that it has its' own value.  But newspapers need revenue.  Like any business, they'll look for extra profit centers inside their own.  If it costs them viewership, they'll need to reverse course at some point.

 

Anonymous

Wausau, WI


The problem is, for every source of news that does charge, there are an untold number that are free.

This is a test...it will fail because the internet is about the free flow of information, no matter how inaccurate.

Newspapers have rendered themselves irrelevant because they are no longer objective and report news...they have agendae. I can go anywhere to read fantasy, or, just create my own. I don't need to pay to read it on the internet.

 

jimnaustin

Austin, TX


There are other places to blog, so if the WDH decides to start charging people to do it, I think they'll quickly find the number of bloggers here dwindling.

Also, I think that the ability to post comments on news articles is part of the draw of the (ad-supported) website. If commenting costs money, too, then I can see the website's traffic dropping off. I know I wouldn't bother coming here as often, if at all. Will enough people pay the subscriber fees to offset the lost ad revenue from the decreased traffic?

 

Brom845

Wausau, WI Daily Herald


I fully understand Tallahassee Democrat's reasons for trying this experiment. $9.95 is not a lot of money but I feel that with the amount of money that [they] make on advertising that they can still offer free services to the public. I am happy to have found your blog  on this thread. I hope to find some of my old TD friends and detractors here as well. Thanks eddo.

 

Anonymous

Jacksonville, FL

[I'm glad you found me, as well.  I hope to keep you as a regular.  Thanks. -ED]


A fee of $9.95 per month is a small price to pay of entertainment / information. I think most would go for it. I'd add to to the list of Garbage fees I pay every month.

 

BigLeeBail

San Jose, CA


Excellent post. Using the example from [the] other newspaper, I'd pay $9.95 a month.

 

IowaJBS

Des Moines, IA Register


"The right to rant may not be free for long"

Could very well happen! To get 'mayo' on a burger at a restaurant cost me an additional $.49 (for less than a teaspoon).

 

tstrang

St. Cloud, MN Times


...I wonder if they (the papers) are doing this also to try to stop the spammers. If that is the case, and they want to keep their human bloggers, maybe they can make a person be "registered" for a week or so before they can blog? Or maybe have to reply to a different blog to show they aren't just a commercial bot?

 

Gordon2

Great Falls, MT Tribune

[If you apply the old When guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns theory you may never see the end of abusive bloggers. -ED]


"Free" in free speech does not mean "without cost", but rather without "constraint". This right has ALWAYS been expensive, paying a subscription, or viewing more advertising, is rather affordable when compared to the real price of this right.

 

ColdMockingbird

Montgomery, AL Advertiser


A paper (Bismarck Tribune)I have read for over 60 years tried to charge for internet access a year or two ago. I had a subscription when I lived there and had been reading it daily for years on the internet after leaving that state. I buy the print edition when I am visiting . I ( and I am sure others ) wrote and explained that I would quit reading their paper. I love newspapers and read about 6 or 7 papers daily on the internet from places around the world that mean something to me and also subscribe to my local paper ( St. Cloud Times ). They dropped this policy after a short time but never announced why . I sent them a thank you as I would have hated not reading their fine newspaper. I have stopped reading other papers when they started charging. At least one other has dropped the policy and one other ( Key West Citizen ) has most of the paper free but has a few articles each day that the reader has to pay to read. I skip those articles. I hope Gannett drops this idea.

 

MacCuill

St. Cloud, MN Times


I have heard for a couple years now that Gannett is first trying it at the smaller newspapers to see how it goes.  If it goes well there - they will start trying it at the larger ones.

You can't fault a newspaper for trying to stay afloat during a fastly sinking ship so to speak.  I mean, seriously, why pay for a newspaper when you can get it online for free?  As [typically] older people who still enjoy the actual newspaper start to die off...most people who then get older probably have gone online to get most of their "readable" news content.

And nothing stops anyone from blogging out in the blogosphere without being affiliated with a newspaper.  You don't have to "go dark" if and when this happens across the board.

 

MariannSimms

Montgomery, AL Advertiser

[Judging by my own old visitor logs, the Greenville and Tallahassee Gannett websites get more hits and have (had?) more User Blog readers than most of the others that you might think are "bigger" outlets. -ED]


If it goes pay-per-view, I will stop. The New York Times tried that, and had to give it up after a year or two. They lost too many online readers.

 

GimmeChocolate

Lafayette, LA Daily Advertiser


The truth of the matter is that ad revenue is no longer cutting it.  That, along with declining subscription sales, is forcing a new business model on newspapers in order to survive.  A newspaper is a hugely expensive thing to operate (the cost of the rolls of paper alone exceeds the salaries of everyone in the building in most places).  This reality has to be acknowledged at some point by those of us that value the function of local journalism...

KevinW
Great Falls, MT

[I repeat: 'However, being ostensibly an advertising revenue-based industry, it appears that the collective Gannett sales department may have dropped the ball.' -ED]


What these newspapers do not get, and probably never will, is this: The Liberal agenda is a losing proposition. Few want to pay to read what amounts to Progressive propaganda. And this idea of charging for access to this propaganda? These newspapers are shooting themselves, not only in the foot, but in the financial heart of their operations. You can't sell advertising if you don't get eyeballs to peruse your copy. You can't get the eyeballs if you don't build a reputation for reporting the truth--the whole truth, whether that suits the managing editor's and reporter's political views or not.

The bottom lines of every MSM newspaper, radio station, television station and cable station are suffering because the so-called reporters, editors and journolistas thought the American People were so stupid as to not recognize a lie versus a truth. They thought the People wouldn't notice the subtle embedding of the reporter's opinions (i.e. propaganda) within the copy. And they were wrong. They're definitely wrong in pursuing a pay-for-play business model that serves up liberal pablum. I'm wondering if there's any journalists left who know how to research and write a story without personal bias or an editor left in this world (outside myself and a couple of others) who knows how to edit out personal biases in favor of reporting the facts (of both sides). I don't think they teach that style of reporting or editing at the college level anymore.

It's not that people aren't hungry for news, it's not only the Internet that's affected the bottom lines of the MSM, it's the lies and propaganda they're serving up as copy. Being typical liberals, however, they refuse to admit that a majority of the People have woke up from the long national nightmare they helped create and the People aren't buying the lies, the propaganda, the Kool-Aid, the Progressive pablum anymore.

If you serve the Truth, and only the Truth, the world will beat down your doors.

 

novelator

Great Falls, MT Tribune



 

Read eddobloggo®  at...

Des Moines, IA Register Lansing, MI State Journal

Rochester, NY Democrat/Chronicle

Sioux Falls, SD ArgusLeader

Great Falls, MT Tribune Melbourne, FL  Florida Today Phoenix, AZ Arizona Republic Springfield, MO News-Leader
Indianapolis, IN Star Montgomery, AL Advertiser Salem, OR Statesman-Journal St. Cloud, MN Times
Lafayette, LA Daily Advertiser Palm Springs, CA Desert Sun Salinas, CA The Californian

Wausau, WI Daily Herald

 

BorMar

 

Get your website found!

 

 Read More...

 

Who is the Blog Watchdog?

CD Business Cards

Enginneering Services, CD Business Cards and more from BorMar!

            Engineering Services

 

 <<

 

<< Townhall

<< Grumpyelder

<< The Crow's Nest

AXL the German Shepherd Wonder Dog is eddobloggo's best friend!

 

 It's AXL!

 Technologies

SEO Specialists

Conservative Blogs

Adopt a pet!


© Copyright Ed Donath/eddobloggo®

2008-2011

All rights reserved worldwide.